16 Oct 2016 16:37:03
Cubs offseason:

Re-sign:
Joe Smith 2 year deal
Trevor Cahill 2 year deal

Sign:
Mark Reynolds 1 year deal

Trade:
CHC gets: Drew Smyly

TB gets: Jorge Solar

Lineup:
1. Fowler CF
2. Zobrist 2nd
3. Bryant 3rd
4. Rizzo 1st
5. Schwarber LF
6. Heyward RF
7. Contreres C
8. Pitcher
9. Russell SS

Bench:
1. Montero C
2. Szczur/ Almora Jr. OF
3. Beaz INF
4. La Stella INF
5. Reynolds 1st

Rotation:
1. Arrieta
2. Lester
3. Hendricks
4. Lackey
5. Smyly

Bullpen:
1. Cahill
2. Wood
3. Edwards Jr.
4. Montgomery
5. Strop
6. Smith
7. Rondon

What do you guys think?


1.) 16 Oct 2016
16 Oct 2016 19:04:59
New man crush and I think Reynolds had a good enough year to earn a starting job somewhere.


2.) 16 Oct 2016
16 Oct 2016 19:41:46
Reynolds is definetly there to replace Sull's man crush LoMo.


3.) 16 Oct 2016
16 Oct 2016 22:20:52
What wver I feel like this would work.


4.) 16 Oct 2016
16 Oct 2016 23:17:35
Wow, two moves, not just one. Also I think they need to bring in at least four more back up first baseman. Maybe bring in Nava and LoMo as well.


5.) 17 Oct 2016
16 Oct 2016 23:53:14
I like the rumor CS 16. Could you give me an idea of Reynolds salary next season since he had a good year. Thank you.


6.) 17 Oct 2016
17 Oct 2016 14:28:46
probably around the $5-7 million range for 1 year.


7.) 17 Oct 2016
17 Oct 2016 16:36:13
Thank you.


8.) 17 Oct 2016
17 Oct 2016 16:37:31
Not a chance Tampa Bay accepts that trade.


9.) 17 Oct 2016
17 Oct 2016 18:55:16
There probably would be other pieces involved but those players would be at the center of the deal.


10.) 17 Oct 2016
17 Oct 2016 19:49:26
The number one issue with the Cubs going into the offseason will be what they intend to do with Aroldis Chapman. Resign him would be the best situation, however, he won't be cheap and he won't be on a short contract. Without this question answered, the Cubs are just twiddling their thumbs.


11.) 17 Oct 2016
17 Oct 2016 22:39:40
In no way, shape, or form do the Rays accept Jorge Soler as the headliner for Drew Smyly. None.


12.) 17 Oct 2016
17 Oct 2016 22:51:56
Soler sucks a** no team in their right mind would trade for him. Smyly is a number 2 pitcher Soler is a guy that should be in the independent league. Sull is still going to argue though.


13.) 18 Oct 2016
18 Oct 2016 14:46:08
Solar had a pretty good year and when I meant he would be the headliner of the trade since he would be the only MLB ready talent heading to TB and the Cubs could still add some high level prospects to the trade as well.


14.) 18 Oct 2016
18 Oct 2016 15:03:52
In what way did Soler have a good year?

Sull, I'm opening a door for you to prove you actually understand baseball. Give me some stats that suggested he was good this year.


15.) 18 Oct 2016
18 Oct 2016 15:56:28
He might not have had a great year but he significantly improved his production from last year. The loss of Schwarber deffenitly helped so he could get more at bats but he has regained some of his value. And for Smyly he had a down year which lowers his value as well. I feel like if the Cubs send Solar and possibly a top 15 prospect to the rays for Smyly and either a low level prospect or possibly even a bullpen arm if the Cubs send a little more I can see this happening.


16.) 18 Oct 2016
18 Oct 2016 18:30:54
Soler did have a .769 OPS, though that doesn't mean he is good enough to get Smyly. You can't really say that he had a good year because he on had 220 or so ABs.


17.) 19 Oct 2016
19 Oct 2016 00:56:48
I just think that Solar who is an outfielder and the Rays need ourfielders and solar is young too and with all the pitching the Rays have they can move on from Smyly. That was just my idea.